Remineralisation and blending

Puts a controlled amount of mineral back into water that has had it removed, so what reaches the machine sits inside the target band instead of below it.

Two mechanisms reach the same destination and they are not interchangeable. BLENDING diverts a measured proportion of the untreated or carbon-filtered supply around the treatment stage and recombines it afterwards; the output is a weighted average of two waters, which means everything in the bypassed stream — hardness, alkalinity, chloride, whatever the test found — arrives in proportion. DOSING passes the treated water through a medium that dissolves as water contacts it, adding mineral that was chosen rather than inherited. Blending costs nothing to run and gives you back a smaller version of the problem you paid to remove. Dosing costs a consumable and gives control over composition rather than only over quantity. Which is right depends entirely on why the water was stripped in the first place: if the supply was merely over-mineralised, a blend is the honest and cheap answer; if it carried something you specifically wanted gone, a blend reintroduces it and dosing is the only real option. The target in either case is the same and it is two-sided — enough dissolved mineral for flavour compounds to bind to and carry, and enough buffering that the water is not aggressive toward the metal it spends its life inside. THE FAILURE HIDDEN IN BOTH is drift. A blend valve delivers a proportion of a feed that changes with season, source and tank turnover; a dosing cartridge depletes from the day it is fitted. The output moves in both cases, and it moves silently, because the water looks and flows exactly the same the entire time. Nothing about this stage announces itself. It is verified with a reading or it is not verified at all.

© 2026 Mostafa Aly · Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0